2.5.04

changes have come.

i just realized how in 40 years theres been a massive change as to what is sexy. first of granted i do believe that people always considered a woman prancing around all naked and fancy free to be inherently sexy. but thats not what i mean. i mean how we went from the women in the 40's (thinking movie stars) looking sexy by being glamorous. it wasnt about how much skin they showed but how they carried themselves, their personal sexiness. now its a matter of being as pornoish as you can so youll be sexy. using mtv as a reference... alicia keys - classy sexy. britney/christina/jessica - sex (whoreish kinda looky im showing so much skin and look i have breasts!) so ok... most people are happy and overjoyed at this cause they always have to do outdo each other so we get to see more skin and more provocative poses than ever before. hiphops videos flood us with upclose and personal crotch shots and more bouncing booty than has been seen since the days of the pirates, but they had more plundering. thing is i think its been overdone and now im jaded and indifferent. not to say i dont like the pictures cause i do. but i want the glamor sexy to come back a bit more (think nicole kidman pulls it off lately). or at least not forced sexiness. (gwen stefani seems sexy just being who she is, not a fabricated sexy) i mean you hear britney/christina speak and well... it doesnt give the same impression as when you see their video. so its just different. and while they may be attractive (and this im applying to all women in mtv lately and even some i know personally) really it seems to be too much effort and far to shallow (oh and if your prancing around in low low rise i can see your thong (or lack of) jeans with the tight tight barely there t-shirt... forgive me for not respecting you and giving you the respect i think you deserve based on the look... but its hard to assume that if thats what your wearing that you are a nice upstanding sweet christian individual with truly important ideas regarding the political scene and political upheaval and the strife that comes from it in uzbekistan... rather it seems to me that that particular look kinda screams "look at me! look look! i have legs, and an ass! and breasts! touch me touch me take me home and feel me!!") it is shallow though isnt it? we now base sexiness on how much skin we can see on a person as opposed to the person (and no bullshit about how personality cannot be seen in a video cause it can) or their personality.. subtlety is being lost. but i suppose based on the experiences ive had with the current crop of freshmen that its only way to get into their thick dense heads anymore, cause no one understand subtlety anymore. you have to practically bash an idea into their head with a crowbar for them to even start to pay attention, nevermind trying to get them to appreciate something as subtle as sexy with all the clothes on (and by the by... when did playboy stop being sexy? is it just me or is 50lbs of silicon with soft focus and massive airbrushing just not something that particularly does it for me? not to mention after a while youll realize that they all kind of share a similar look. which is to say, a girl that hugh would like to shag, who also posseses massive breasts cause nothing is sexier than surgery and silicone) so i hope and prey and wait.. impatiently but i wait.

No comments: